I've been collecting these old
Walter T. Foster books for years. Initially I sought them for their kitsch value. Recently however, like
the New Jersey man who two weeks ago chomped down on a pearl in his fried oyster special, I have been finding special little moments in several of them.

Actually, this book has enough bright spots in it that I Googled Claude Parsons only to find that there is a Memorial Award for Landscape painting in his name available from
The American Artists Professional League, INC. I wonder if his story is slipping through the cracks? I particularly enjoy this "fault" and his example:

The purple and green are so sweet. The lesson of the descending scale of choices (power, weak, and dead) is a poignant one. I find myself pleading with students to "quit beating-up that line" as they scratch away at an edge that isn't even a contour. It got me to thinking about "trusting your mark" and forcing yourself to move around the canvas. I also found myself pondering the whole "third time is a charm" thing
again. I couldn't find much about that old saying on the net. There was the bizarre notion that it is related to some old English law that if you are not successfully dead after the third attempt at them hanging you, you can go free.

Maybe there is some holy
trinity thing going on? (painting above by
Perugino)
"All good things come in threes. People still believe that good or bad luck may follow someone three times in a row. The word bad may substitute for good. Things (death, luck, trouble, misfortune, murders, disasters) come in threes is a variant of the proverb. First attested in the United States in 1927..." From "Random House Dictionary of Popular Proverbs and Sayings" by Gregory Y. Titelman.
Anyway you look at it, I was chasing down the wrong question really. Three strokes don't make a better mark. There is nothing charming about an overworked painting. Then I thought what Claude Parsons was getting at was something like "first guess, best guess" which interestingly enough took me quickly to Rebecca Alzofon and her site that is dedicated to deconstructing Pierre-Paul Prud-hon's unique hatching style. She has some interesting craftsmanship lessons.
I sure learned a lot this morning. But don't let all this sentimental representation stuff fool ya, I still have a soft spot for Paul Klee.
7 comments:
Funny, I find the "don't" examples to be so much more appealing than the do's. But then I don't like to be told what to do either (except by you of course, check out my comments here.>
Love the Klee you put up.
Tracy, when I look at the "faults" this afternoon, it sure does look like the second and third marks have much more variety and shimmer. While the first mark is a little ham-fisted. Damn it. Another truth shot to hell.
Steve,
i got home tonight and my dearest friend wrote an email to me, from Berlin (his name is "LEN"). He loved the Claude Parsons vinyette (sp?), concerning "weakness" -- caused by overbrushing.
i find it has a lesson in it as well: "Trusting your mark". This equates/translates out for me as such -- that i trusted myself on finding my graduate program in Berlin, after my harrowing research, etc etc etc --- and that i must trust my instincts and follow my path (heart) to Berlin.
It's amazing, that we can hear messages that the universe sends us, yes?
btw, the "wordy diva" blog is awesome! I must be her fake cousin! She sounds alot like me.
Dawn
I have a small collection of Walter T. Foster books. I used some of them when I was a lot younger, like one on anatomy for artists (the cover's changed, but the innards look the same) and another on drawing the female figure (same thing -- naked chicks, oo la la). I'm torn, though, on whether I should encourage my daughter to use these books; on the one hand, I think it might be good for her to learn some craft (perspective, shading). On the other hand, she's so young and free and inspired, and I'd hate to deaden that.
As far as trusting your mark: That's something I've learned to do over the past few years. I think it's good. But of course there's no One True Path. There's no path at all, only a trackless forest, and you neither start nor end in a clearing.
Chris,
You are so right about trusting your mark, and that there isn't just "One true path".
Thank you for sharing that wisdom today!
:-)
Well, that's the thing about realistic and abstract, macro/micro. Get in close enough to anything and it becomes abstract.
Post a Comment