Friday, June 30, 2006

Instilling awe Tonight, Saturday July 1, at 8:00pm (Pacific time), Love Battery will be playing at the High Dive and it will be streaming live from KEXP's Audioasis. I applied my sanding through shtick to Love Battery's Confusion Au Go Go cover art, the band's 2000 release on C/Z. "It is arguably their best record since the amazing Dayglo from 1991." I've never been to the High Dive. Hundreds of clubs have opened in Seattle since we lived there. I just hope that the venue doesn't get into trouble for using Gil Elvgren's image on their web site. On second thought, as a painter, maybe I DO hope that they get into trouble. As far as KEXP goes, Stacy and I always listen to DJ Riz do his Expansions shows. It is a blessing that here in the State of Jefferson, we can archive any of his shows and listen any time. The station where the music matters also has a blog up and running for the hardcore buffs. The funny thing is, I've never seen them make these faces before.

Thursday, June 29, 2006

The following six postcards have been sitting on my back burner for over seven years. They're getting nowhere. I'd like to make them a group project.




Rip, sample, burn, scan, tweak, add, draw on, print out. . . its up to you.

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

How To Draw A Bunny, 43


Joker, 30


I love this figure, but I can't figure out what the "K" is there for.
The Western Airlines nik-nak box is soooo ping-pong table on avacado shag carpet.

Sunday, June 25, 2006

Picton Points, two

Matthew Picton invited me over for some drinks and a studio visit this weekend.

Before we even got into the studio, I noticed this new piece on the dining room wall.It turns out that this is, in fact, a very old piece that Matthew only recently hung. It really caught my eye. Apperently, in his early attempts to map our reality, Matthew used double stick tape methodically applied over a "found" surface rubbed with charcoal. In this case it was a bit of sidewalk near my home. He called it "a charcoal drawing of the eminent shattering of the solid surface."I found myself thinking of my new drawings.
Matthew was surprised that I had never seen this piece. It had been some time since I'd been to his house. It became clear that I had not seen his newest purchase. It is a Hiroshi Sugimoto reproduction. We filled our glasses and ambled across the house in order to bask.
Matthew begins: "There it is, look. Embossed in there is Pacific Ocean, Oregon Coast, 1985. It sort of archives this . . .
this. . .
what's so great about this is, I swear to god, it has this very weird sort of atmosphere to it. One that’s incredibly sort of like. . .” he sighs and seems to gather himself, “. . . well its very internal obviously. To me its very annihilating too existence because its just so completely endless, and such an infinity and so, and so. . . and even beyond time in some ways. . . its just great. And then it’s categorized by a time and a moment which is, which is, which is
irrelevant."

There was a natural pause. Oddly, the whole time I had been staring at the embossed title in the paper. It was so subtle and tombstone-like. Listening to his words I was making this connection between our fleeting lives as a frozen moment and a single frame in the 16+ per second it takes to make a fluid Movie.
Awkwardly, all I can say at the time is, “It’s stamped."Matthew rolled with my blurting. "Imagine though, if you had the full thing hey, at the end of your bed, and it would be like, it would be this wide” he stretches his arms out (The big platinum prints are 50 inches),
“Oh god!" he says as he begins to swoon, "and you’d wake up each morning and just like fall into it. It would be just amazing."

We eventually made it to his studio.

It quickly became apperent that the main reason that Matthew had invited me over was because he is considering framing this piece but doubts his insticts and wanted another opinion. He feels that it needs “containing”. I can't tell right away. I have to walk closer and marvel at the pins and the enamel paint on plastic. “It’s very difficult to put together” he says with obvious understatement. “There is a thousand pins in it.” I made a mental flash to Mindsprinter's drawings with steel wool and pins in the wall.

There was no time to articulate this tangential connection to Matthew because even before I could say "Wow" He says, “Its very vascular.”

Which completely derails me while locking me in at the same time. Heck yeah. It seems that Matthew is tapping into the fourth dimensional veins of our planet. “The river is the support structure for this other infrastructure that’s placed on top. What it is is, you’ve got the Ganges and the Brahmaputra and the rail structures in the middle and the road structures overlaid on top." I am infected with his excitement.
I worry about the frame idea casting unwanted shadows.
We talk about shadows and his previous work.
But then I am distracted by this piece.
Matthew explains, "Here is the London A to Zed project part one. The river Thames down the middle. This is central city London. Kind-of where I’ve lived. You’ve got this semi-mirroring going on behind it on this silver sheet. Now if you move this closer you can get the mirror fairly perfect. . . but actually, I like the blur. A slight blur is quite nice, you know?"

As Matthew continues, he casually pronounces a memorable observation,
"In a sense it’s a poem of civilization.”
The names follow the rivers. “Its sort of a maritime global history. . . of London in particular. London is a good city to choose, because its unique in this element, I think, as being the country in Europe that expanded to the greatest degree and the expansion that it went through is reflected in the names in the city. More so than any other city really. The names are reflective of the industrial and trading heritage surrounding the rivers. . . Its just a word piece really. I’ve left out the structure you see."

I do see. I see what Matthew has left out. It is beautiful.

Friday, June 23, 2006

Portrait (self)

Dad
Zaida LaRose
Marker on paper

What can I say?
I could tell you in great detail the set and setting or, fuckin' check it out!


I gotta say something.
I can't help it, so I might ruin it:
Sitting in a long haired bean-bag chair, I was reading to Zaida. I started to read a book and after a page or two she plopped down next to me and started to draw. I wasn't allowed to move (but I was supposed to keep reading (she is appreciating drawing while listening to sounds)(while I'm thinking that life drawing models have an under paid job). Zaida got confused with the legs and asked for help. Actually she said "oh. . . shoot. . .I messed up, oh well, its just a drawing". That's when I knew that things were going to be OK. "Oh well" she said.
Uh-Oasis.
Working without fear of mistakes.
That's huge!
When I became conscious that Zaida was drawing me, I couldn't read anymore. I tried to hold my pose and look at what she was doing. Watching her draw I could see that everything had a meaning, except for fields of color. The "Penquins Rock" t-shirt I was wearing seems to spill from the book I was reading (posing). She laughed at my "macaw" hair. We laughed even harder when I discovered that she meant "mohawk" (old man style). I found myself saying: "Draw what you see, not what you know" with conviction, as if it was some gentle and obvious truth. While my almost six year old struggled over these words, I found myself marveling at her control of symbols. She is not even six and she is fighting symbols!

Her brow was furrowed.
I never realized until tonight that there was a difference between a furrowed brow of frustration and a furrowed brow of engagement. She was engaged with and even had a Jordanesque tongue happening.
I've been using the image above as the portrait that follows my name in the blogosphere. I think that I might change it to Zaida's drawing.

I was looking for some subtle change. In my previous post I expressed a cup less then full.
chrisjag said...

I understand how you feel, I have been blogged out myself (reading very few) - artwork needs to be fed with lots more stuff than just other art. I am interested in personal insights into an artists life that the blog can offer, but even then, small doses. Good luck.

(bing)

chrisjag said...

I wanted to add, artists blogs are interesting to me because I feel like they are more for the author than for any audience. Of course this means they won't always be as "good" as most other reading or entertainment, but they are different animal altogether.

Thanks for pointing out Harolds blog, looks like a great start!

(bing,bing)

I read these comments by Chris and I went about my day.
I copied some drawings from Albert Hurter, just to get my chops up.
Just to get the flow back.
Just to enter the Uh-Oasis.


I checked in later and High Low and in between had commented.
highlowbetween said...

Steven - I'll work harder for you! :)
Keep the faith - highs and lows as we all know. I'll check out Harold.
True confessions coming soon to HLIB.
seriously, I'm interested in some points ChrisJag mentions.

more later...

(bing)
Present company is excluded from my boredom HLiB. Don't go changin' (unless you have to). Ah, but then you changed a little with Poe: on effect. I loved it. Regarding highs and lows, thanks for the reminder of the wave. You set me up to see this bumper sticker today:
Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it
Mohandas Gandhi words on a moss-green 1966 Corvair

I didn't exaggerated my ennui of last night, but it was the first time that I blogged about my doubt (I think). I would not have blogged about my doubt unless I had come across Harold's nascent blog.
harold hollingsworth said...

I was at Chris's blog-via Dennis Hollingsworth's blog, I'll tell you what, it gave me new found energy in the studio, like I was on a journey with a peer. Chris, I'm watching, Dennis gave you props, so I'm in, Steve, well, I have some painting here in my home of yours, what a small and infecting world, I really have the itch, hope I don't let you all down!

What painting?
(update: it is this painting)
From the Shoot painters marathon at CoCA?
There is no letting down if you just "do", without fear of mistakes.
harold hollingsworth said...

by the way, the music that you shared on your blog is still resonating with me Steve!

I've got to point out that I was surrounded by talented people. However, the one thing that I took away from those days is how fantastic it is to be in a band. It is so different from the solitary world of the studio. The communication in real-time is truely living. My daughter may be picking up things from me in the studio, but I am hoping that she completely understands music.
harold hollingsworth said...

by the way, nice of you to give me props, nex time I roll to San Francisco, shall we get together on my way down?

Oh yeah! (541-951-0955)

The most recent comment was from Chris R.
Chris Rywalt said...

I've been through phases like yours before, Steve. Not just in terms of art on the Internet, but on the Internet in general. I'm thinking back to the days when content first started appearing in large amounts, early 1994. We'd started up our own Web server and were throwing out a lot of random stuff. And one day I was reading, surfing -- this was before text searching -- and I realized I was skimming things, barely looking at them, and moving on, restless.

I tried to figure out, was it me? Was I just tired of the Web? Was the Web over and done with? Keep in mind, I'd watched FTP become uninteresting, I'd watched Gopher barely emerge before being overtaken by the WWW. So it was possible the Web was dying, too.

This went on for several days, maybe a couple of weeks, even. Then one day I stumbled on this site -- Mark Jason Dominus' Universe of Discourse. And I spent the next three or four days reading the entire thing obsessively.

I then realized that the problem wasn't that the Web was dying, or that I had grown bored, or any of that. I just hadn't found the good stuff and was still mired in the old, tired, and cruddy. As soon as I found something really good, I remembered what it was all about.

I've been through many more phases like that, where I just feel tapped out on the Web. Whatever topic is interesting me at the time, whatever cliques I'm circling, there come times when things cool off for a bit.

They pick back up again eventually.

As far as Chris Ashley's suggestion that the Internet should be more than an extension of print-based publishing, I say, good luck. I've been around this here Internet block a few times and have yet to see anything I'd really call worthy of the Internet as a medium as opposed to a distribution channel. The closest I can recall is actually from pretty early in the Web's history:
The Urban Diary from 1995. That was kind of neat.

Another plea for riding the wave. Thanks Chris. I realize that I wasn't really bored with my links, I was bored with myself. I was the one who was " old, tired, and cruddy". I threw myself into one last Albert Hurter forgery just to loosen up the ole wing:



And then I made this drawing:

I'm going to draw a version of this that will be as wide as I am tall.
It will be a portait.

Thursday, June 22, 2006

Harold Hollingsworth

A Begining


I sat in my studio last night reading the new issue of MOJO. Occasionally, I would look up to the walls hoping something would rip me up from my chair. But the felt-pen drawings seemed too consuming to dive into at such a late hour. The goofy painting studies seemed over-worked and pointless. Oddly, the photo-like compositions while even more absurd, seemed the most possible and beautiful. It took me two hours to come to terms with the fact that I was not going to be an "artist" that night. I then sat down at the computer and was quickly getting bored with the painting blogosphere. I did find some important nuggets in Chris Ashley's Case Study in which he is included in a research project that dances around this topic: "How well do various Internet-based media exploit the affordances of the Internet, and what recommendations might be made to media practitioners who seek to utilise the full potential of the Internet as a medium and as a distribution entity?" My feeling was that I was bored with the painters who blog. Maybe I was bored with my links. Chris just confirmed my suspicion that a blog should be used for part of an overall art practice not just as an extention "of print-based publishing: commentary, reviews, news, promotion, gossip, and pictures. . ." or not simply for "studio views – showcasing work in progress or finished, installation views, a kind of window into the artist’s working world" I wanted something more last night. Even High Low & in between's fired up condemnation of shitty paintitng left me wondering why I felt nothing. Was I too thick skinned? Tired? Empty? But then Harold Hollingsworth hit the scene right before I went to bed. He started his blog, left some comments at FoCB (up front as well as in the archives), effectively raising my hopes. Here are some of Harold's paintings.

Figure 8 (Diptych)
oil on paper
45 x 60 inches (framed)

from Circa Gallery

Libby | Plone
acrylic and oil on canvas
48 x 36 inches each
also from Circa Gallery

Fort
Oil on Wood Panel
15"x18"
2006
From his Flickr sight


Let's see what Harold can do with a blog.

Wednesday, June 21, 2006


I've been holding onto this image for months now, thinking that it would make a fantastic painting.

Monday, June 19, 2006


Weep (first sketch/doodle)
Steven LaRose, 2006

How To Draw A Bunny, 41 and 42

Whiting Tennis, 1991

Whiting Tennis, 2004

Sunday, June 18, 2006

Six months ago to the day

We were workin' the aluminum tree (like always).

We have been trying to figure out what this object is. It is 40 ft. up in a backyard tree.

Aura 2


A second version has been blossoming, percolating, and exploding this weekend.

Friday, June 16, 2006

Suburban Seattle, the mid-1970s

I was in my early adolescence when I painted my first still life. I remember everything about the moment. Sitting at the kitchen table, smelling the steamy fried temptations, I painted a Herfy's burger, fries, and cola. I remember my ass being kicked by the burger's foil. I remember drinking the soda out of the line of sight. The painting recently showed up in a box of letters and yearbooks. The paper is brittle, practically decomposing. I had the painting sitting on a pile labeled "toss or flat-file." It seemed so uniquely relevant to my past that I couldn't decide what to do with it. Its only redeeming quality seemed to be its nostalgia. I'm sure I would have tossed it if I hadn't impulsively bought Charles Burns' Black Hole. Here are two panels from early on in the graphic novel:
"As hypnotically beautiful as it is horrifying, Black Hole transends its genre by deftly exploring a specific American cultural moment in flux and the kids who are caught in it - back when it wasn't exactly cool to be a hippie anymore, but Bowie was still just a little too weird." I recommend this book to my demographic. My painting is now in the flat file.

Monday, June 12, 2006

Aura
June 12, 2006
Steven LaRose
30" x 40"
Black Faber-Castell Pitt Artist Pen
on
Crescent #110 Cold Press Illustration Board

Detail: